Текст книги "The person as the hologram"

The similar conflicts when an existing shortage of resources, the presence of opposing ideologies, general hatred of the poor and disadvantaged to the rich and civilized with high probability are capable to lead the world to a destructive and comprehensive war which with ease will bury all civilization quickly enough.

2.9. Reasonable and reckless persons. Sages and adventurers.

It is curious that in connection with opportunities of use of target programs of self-consciousness, the highest extent which can be associated with wisdom, people can be divided into two main categories: the reasonable beings and the imprudent being.

The reasonable beings prefers to use mostly mind, logic, without aspiring by own efforts to new, but trying to obtain more comfortable state in life from a position of prime acquisition and consumption of its benefits.

As a rule, the reasonable beings use own intellect in the form of conclusions, the abstract forms of the formal logic, and sometimes uses elements of dialectics. The reference example of similar approach is the mathematics. The Iconic form and the verbal form of communication are applied by the reasonable beings generally to achievement of the utilitarian purposes (benefit).

Effectiveness of own speculative (abstract) constructs is checked in practice, i.e. in targeted actions, as a rule, jointly, including in culture, consumption of habitat, in particular, for food, in manufacture and consumption of artificial objects, as well as in an exchange of everything that is, by means of some equivalent (money). The form of this process, opened for people, distinguishes them from animals, whose instinctive-reflex communication with the environment does not open for them.

Rational approach of the reasonable beings to life allows them to open the new relations of objects and the phenomena only in other combination of objects, and new objects – only a combination of the known parts in a different way – according to logical constructions in correlation with themselves.

For example, they can think up a chair, having seen that on a bench at a wall is more convenient to sit, and to add a back to a bench. They can use firewood for heating, but they are not able think up a gas burner, inasmuch for its designing is not enough a combination of the known objects – building of new models from mechanical designs with application of laws of combustion and heat-exchange is required though when receiving the corresponding template, they can stamp gas burners in any quantity, and even a few to improve them on efficiency of action and on design.

Such entities have no special desire to go beyond the limits of rationality, i.e. – of a template, both in things, and in the relations among themselves.

The habitual standard dictates to them to live like everyone, consuming what is, creating around themselves the surroundings of artificial and natural objects only to update it regularly, finding satisfaction in this incessant process.

They have no understanding, that the pursuit for consumer values is quite monotonous, and it never gives the result satisfying the person completely.

At such behavior the people actually evinces preference to the monotonic existence – as if to the life-sleep with rare moments of awakening which, as a rule, are initiated by external circumstances (marriages, divorce, new job, diseases, death of the close people, etc.).

Having lived the life, similar reasonable beings with surprise discover in it, in effect, absence of interesting and outstanding events precisely because they were trying to follow to pragmatic approach.

In this regard they are surprisingly similar in behavior with animals for whom, though they are not able to reason, the main thing is to obtain of sensations.

Extreme expression of the reasonable beings is Ionych of Chekhov, on whose prototypes is even no wish to look, to the extent all their existence is blunt and primitive ( A. P. Chekhov's story "Ionych").

It is not necessary to confuse at the same time such as Ionych, in which self-consciousness in the form of respect for own personality "is hammered" into depth, with homeless people.

Homeless people have failed mainly because of not very livable combination of weak will, improvident intelligence, inability to operate by liberty as expression of self-consciousness, but by desire to be free. They are not able to estimate own advantages and shortcomings adequately. Therefore the view of a situation from their party is obscured, decisions are not thought out, insight turn out at them badly because of lack of experience and diligence. Without support they lose or miss everything that they have, and become by unnecessary to nobody, living by begging in constant humiliation.

Homeless people can be carried to the intermediate layer between the reasonable and reckless people (the second main category of people).

This second category with minimum of reasonableness (the reckless beings) prefers unusual life situations owing to their disagreement with formal-logical approaches to life – such life for them is boring and senseless as work on the conveyor on tightening screws.

They do not love reasoning, logical constructions, try to avoid analytical and synthetic work, hate the actions according to pragmatic calculations; at the same time, they, as a rule, – at all not workaholics.

Therefore the target programs of self-consciousness in combination with programs of the lowest consciousness can be applied by the reckless beings with great success, if, of course, these beings are capable to combine so contradictory forms of consciousness, for fast and resolute change of a situation in favor of the conceived.

In other words, they prefer not the long-term reflections, not systematization of the facts and phenomena, i.e. not rational actions, but actions spontaneous, or actions at which the goal can be achieved for one-stage as if instinctively though, of course, they should work beforehand in acquisition of craft skills and gain experience.

Exactly such people make discoveries, create masterpieces of poetry, painting, inventions, they become by the outstanding commanders. That is their activity is manifested generally in the creative scope, which attracts them at all not with a position of consumption of some benefits and goods – they are interested in the process.

Alas, en masse the results of their activity are very mediocre both concerning the quality made by them and concerning acquisition of consumer values (they do not like to hoard stuff) owing to a lack of experience and laziness, and often – narrowness and ignorance; but defeats especially do not disturb them. It is pleasant to them to use the talent or ability, often – very mediocre (graphomaniacs) for receiving result without special effort of the intellect.

And they fall back into the old ways, like the card player who cannot move away from the card-table.

Nevertheless, there are creators new as in the field of technologies, and culture among them.

Thereby these, one may say, makers try to create, first of all, other values, but not to keep own wellbeing if, of course, the intuition, which they try to use often, does not cheat to them.

It is possible to note here the virtual absence of women in this cohort of the reckless creative individuals. There are almost no women either among inventors, nor in the ranks of warlords, nor among philosophers, major ideologies, religious authorities, etc.

However women in every way seek to keep the family center, they take care of children, they work as teachers, doctors, accountants, bureaucrats of all colors, etc. That is they are bright examples of conservatism in every respect, and they without hesitation can be carried to rational entities. It is visible from here – to what rational activity is inclined to most of all, and how this activity is important for development as "soil" for "germination" of all other.

Examples of not pragmatic love for process of creation are masterpieces of painting of impressionists which at their life nobody recognized; great music for which paid very poorly (Mozart); brilliant novels which were written in haste to hand out of debts (Dostoyevsky); inventions, without special hopes for their demand.

The reckless beings seldom live long because often ignore safety, conveniences of life, own health, but, as a rule, their life reminds the adventure novel or a tragicomedy. Actually, novels about them with the poor end compose.

One of extreme expressions of this category of persons is adventurers and fraudsters. With them everything is clear.

The opposite extreme expression of this category of people are the sages, for whom intellect is not so important (they can be clever or not particularly) precisely because they have practically no big need to use own intellect, so as they seldom gets into critical situations (therefore they are designated as the sages), noting these "slippery" situations for themselves in advance due to almost always. As and shamans, they can combine the highest and lowest consciousness in unison, anyway, to receive the right decisions and to perform adequate actions.

The vast majority of the people, known for the wisdom, were not young people. Apparently, it means that the right decisions aren't given so simply – to approach to them is required knowledge and skills which aren't acquired in one stage. Therefore preliminary conscious accumulation of knowledge and abilities, checked in practice, or experience, can't but be a basis for adequate result in insight.

Along with that wisdom is often associated with the incomprehensible (intricate, convoluted, puzzling). Indeed, the sages themselves could not explain the receiving in insight of the right decision of a problem in any way, just as shamans, and, just as the modern science.

But advices of sages in crises if they and give advices, seldom influence the surroundings, inasmuch a reasonableness is not combined in it with inexplicable enlightenments, and places at fed the authorities borrow, as a rule, the reasonable beings, seeking to keep the reliable old world (consumer society), but not to aspire to new, which, it is not clear, as yet itself "will behave".

Therefore they can listen to advices of wise men, but are not capable to apprehend these advices by the formalistic, conservative mind, in which everything is in advance painted, known and understood, owing to what, for example, the reasonable beings always (and it is vain) laugh at the sages promising arrival of troubles (Cassandra's effect).

Therefore the reasonable beings constantly get into foolish situations, and the most outstanding (quick-witted) of them, according to most people, are those intellectuals, who are capable to get out with the smallest losses from unpleasant situations which they, as a rule, and create themselves.

Exactly these the reasonable beings are glorified by historians though all mind of Napoleon did not prevent him to commit the most stupid campaign to Russia, brilliant, as it is considered, mind of Churchill "helped" to break up the British Empire after the last world war, collective intelligence of Politburo of the USSR was solved on hopeless war in Afghanistan, etc.

By the way, the modern science in the face of the futurologists-intellectuals categorically declares sheer folly within standard logic of extrapolation, with which, in general, nobody argues, that the human civilization will infinitely develop, conquering all new worlds and even galaxies. These futurologists do not suspect or do not want to think that any material finite is not capable to be by continuous infinity within invariable quality: sooner or later any formation inevitably loses the form, i.e. is scattered in ashes or gets other form.

Unlike these clever and reasonable beings, the true wise men are capable optimally to combine as needed the target programs of self-consciousness, experience, knowledge and skills with automatic programs of life support of own lowest consciousness.

They try to reconcile at the critical (necessary) moments of the program of own lowest consciousness with the target programs of the highest consciousness, harmonizing their work within own experience, knowledge and skills. Thereby they put themselves always in the most advantageous position by foresight of the direction of succession of events.

Therefore they look at what is happening as if from above, without special reflections, and succession of events is obvious to them though the true mechanism of this motion and its reason can remain for them unclear.

They mostly observe and regret, inasmuch they understand that the intellectuals in power to them not to overpersuade.

Nevertheless, the sages live not on a separate island, and they as well as all rest to suffer from an arbitrariness and bias of the reasonable beings, which behind trees (benefit) not see the forest (prospects), but, as a rule, are in power owing to the pragmatism and illegibility in means.

Thus, the true sages carry out a role of observers in beingness, showing extreme degree of passivity of the active as own conscious inertness. Thereby they show limitations even of the most advanced individual consciousness, which believes that the world is something uncontrollable or, on the contrary, considers the world is operated by unknown forces with the purposes inaccessible for a human comprehension.

This brief consideration of both categories of people shows that the most efficient for development of individual consciousness are people from category the reckless without extreme groups – of adventurers-idlers and sages. This group of the reckless beings makes, though considerable, but minority, but this minority is the only creative from all population.

Precisely they are "motors" of progress.

They have thought up steam engine, light bulbs, computers, rockets, atomic bomb, gambling and soccer, but not other "swamp" of the reasonable beings, which only can use templates, and not a few sages who, at best, are able to advice.

But these councils seldom who listens, inasmuch the belief in omnipotence of intellect, science, education prevails, whereas they actually are the help for accelerated promotion forward. And this accelerated promotion provide only target programs of self-consciousness in a harmonious, but short-term combination with programs of the lowest consciousness

Without this harmonious combination people could not acquire the highest possible rate of development, inasmuch only merge of both forms of consciousness allows to the open form of individual consciousness to come out for a while through the latent form of individual consciousness directly to own frequency basis – hologram, containing everything, to try to draw from it what is required.

It should be noted the obvious difference of the sages in their relatively rare cohort: some of them proved themselves as famous thinkers, philosophers, advisers to kings and presidents – it is precisely those, which – sillier.

They try to admonish the population that, in general, absolutely senselessly in itself, directly or through rulers, on insufficient or false basis, inasmuch in creation of theories (doctrines) they are self-confident and categorical, placing themselves high, so as believe that if they've seen the light, then under it they are capable to set the "true" base, which is its own for each of them.

They most often perceive answers to the questions in insights perversely or partially, but, nevertheless, they are sincerely sure of originality and the eternal validity of own doctrines and visionary approaches, for example, Schopenhauer, whose theory about the world as will and representation is silly in every respect, inasmuch he puts blind force in it on the main place.

In this number of "thinkers" by exceptional injuriousness are allocated "talents" of religious (Calvin, Leo Tolstoy) and social (Karl Marx, Alfred Rosenberg) ideologists and philosophers-muddles, with the direct participation of which (and later) arose a lot of woes for many people.

If such sages-thinkers get an opportunity to implement directly own or borrowed idea-fix (theory, doctrine) into life, becoming rulers (Robespierre, Lenin, Hitler), and certainly dictators because any of them can't trust this implementation to someone else, to not spoil, then the result is known: the blood flows like water, justice in their understanding triumphs, idea is being embodied into life, it seems, as prescribed, but this idea bursts relatively quickly and necessarily like a soap bubble.

Those of the sages, which are cleverer, withdraw into the shadows, inasmuch they understand, that is impossible to do anything in a bubbling cauldron of life – any guiding star, neither for the individual nor for humanity is not looked through.

They know well that progress in the form of gradual improvement of life of the increasing part of people in the relative and absolute expression, growth of culture, commitment by them to declarations on general love and friendship, as well as tolerance quickly enough leads entire peoples to degradation and the subsequent subordination to the "savage" peoples or disappearance: this fact clearly notes history and similar events partly occur now (pressure of Islam).

Therefore the true sages, such as Kant, understand that everything should go as is, inasmuch the meaning of existence not only human, but all living beings is struggle, competition, appearance and overcome of diverse contradictions, the negation of the old by the new, that there often is expressed within socium as injustice for many.

However a distinct explanation for this statement was not given so far, whereas actually similar existence is caused by dual structure of Creation, in which the infinite Uniform expresses itself in beingness by means of single consciousness through own a holographic projection which is in eternal updating [3, chapter 1].

So, elimination of contradictions, in particular, in social life (harmony) is impossible. Nevertheless, the aspiration to harmony is not forbidden, but harmony is slipping away all the time, like the horizon.

It means that at all not the person and not his civilization – creation pearls which in the future surely have to reach pastures of Heaven, but this pearls are single consciousness in a combination (and coincidence) with individual consciousnesses. The suffering person is their tool, and he will not able get rid from troubles, diseases, death, but the person has to be grateful to own consciousness for the stay not as a thing, not as a plant or an animal, but the being who is not subordinated to anybody and capable to express himself as wants and can on own consideration, and it is unimportant – extensive or scanty this consideration, i.e. – capable to express himself freely in the infinite series of lives.

Mind, intellect, reason, sanity define the same thing, namely: a product of this or that effectiveness of action of the centers processing the entering information from sense organs that is quite comparable to operation of the computer, which in itself, as we know, is not capable to discover either America, or new laws. Though, of course, the self-consciousness, inherent in any person, influences processing of informational streams which to some extent takes place consciously with elements of abstraction and logic, i.e. in an apparent form.

Nevertheless, mind in implicit forms for any living beings and in addition to them in explicit forms for the person is manifested always as the tool allowing them to interact as appropriate with the environment.

So, by means of mind is carried out more or less efficient, but only partially conscious interaction of the person with surroundings which is narrowed even more due to that the person in common life, as a rule, is guided by a habit.

Therefore dominance of intellect before self-consciousness, leaving for the person the comprehension himself as the subject of action, but as it is paradoxical, puts him closer to the lowest consciousness in the person, than to the highest, so as the rational person tries to adapt mostly to an environment, but does not try to change this environment under himself, though, perhaps, he and wants this, but overcomes phobia of risk.

Mind (intellect, reason, sanity) is pragmatic, it is inclined more to repeat the studied actions, i.e. it is inclined to standard algorithms, as if believing for himself – the best the enemy good. Mind seeks to make life steady, convenient and noncontradictory, and is limited to it.

Similar human consciousness is incapable to react to essential changes in surroundings efficiently: it or perishes in the person of its carriers, without sustaining the competition in quickly changing world, or in critical moments confides to the reckless beings, which easily pick up all new, but which can bring to impassable thickets.

Under the wisdom the people intuitively understand possession by the person of the higher quality, than only sanity.

Actually, wisdom is such combination of mind and self-consciousness at which the person is capable to connect the target programs of self-consciousness to the lowest consciousness consciously, but is not spontaneous.

However efficient for development, but often pragmatically hopeless actions, which the sages reject, are undertaken without special reflections above described us people with fair share of imprudence which is not enough at the sages and which is in excess at adventurers.

Sanity of the person in "pure" form works as the computer, according to the given programs, that is consequence of action of the centers processing information entering from sense organs. Therefore the overweight towards rational activity means penchant to templates, i.e. following to a habit and the other already blazed paths for the person that indicates rather poor development of his self-consciousness.

2.10. Partial discovery of form-building abilities in beingness for human consciousness

In order to recognize yourself or any other object the person should have certain form-building abilities. Then it will find in all that is displayed, for example, in a mirror, the set of data, which will come down for consciousness of the specific person into a form of what he looks for, for example, – into his own shape, i.e. the person will obtain information.

Only this property of human consciousness can lead him to acquisition of adequate information, in particular, about himself in a mirror.

This property of consciousness is implemented through the corresponding set of sense organs.

The consciousness of any living being, and not only the person, creates own world, its "now", scanning through sense organs surroundings, penetrating thereby locally into boundless Uniform.

Naturally, any individual consciousness having certain level of development, cannot cover by sensations of own body-carrier and by own comprehension all infinite Uniform; but it is capable by those means which it has (the person has five sense organs), and by those forms which single consciousness provides to it according to its level of development and type of its carrier, to identify in Uniform the things corresponding to its life cycle, and by consecutive irreversible copying through a pause to form own time which is "converted" in each individual consciousness due to loss of a pause in it between the pulse signals passing across canals of sense organs, in colourful, moving and changing "now", in which this individual consciousness can exist in the company with other individual consciousnesses among recognizable and copied things, remaining inseparably with own carrier for a certain time in this existence and sensing this existence.

Objects which the person perceives by the sense organs in certain form, are dependent of him, he forms automatically the surroundings and own body in himself – in own processing centers, inasmuch initially the environment is only the high-frequency information copies of things which "are dissolved" in Uniform, and which are updated by consciousness through sense organs of living beings.

These copies are converted in each individual consciousness, owing to physiological features of the organism perceiving discrete packages of information without pauses between them, in habitual for us things which move and change just because that only among them and in them and not in the high-frequency wave environment can abide, change, grow, reproduce and develop living beings.

However objects of beingness aren't produced by consciousness at all as it is represented to the subjective idealists denying objective existence of matter. Actually objects of beingness are formed by the person, more precisely, by his consciousness through sense organs, out of quite material high-frequency copies in the form of information packages by converting of incoming pulse signals, containing the relevant information, into a smooth picture of moving things with hidden help of single consciousness..

Analog of this process is the ordinary TV with that difference that if on the monitor screen, like a human sleep, move only images of things, converted from pulse radio signals, which aren't a "dense" matter, then in human consciousness (consciousness of any living being) in the course of consecutive coupling of packages-impulses of information, waves are converted mainly in the corpuscles, i.e. – into the changing world of things, apparently, according to the principle, close to the principle of operation of a 3D-printer.

If a mole doesn't see the sky, the sun and stars, these objects for it don't exist as owing to absence of appropriate sense organs, so and – lack of the corresponding form-building abilities. Though, of course, both the sun, and stars and etc. don't disappear anywhere, inasmuch they are formed by single consciousness through all set of living beings, as if covering with them everything various living beings. But the present time of a mole, unlike the present time of the person, with these objects, except a near-surface layer of the earth, directly doesn't contact, though it is in their zone.

In general, in order to get any data, the person has to formulate the object of own desire – consciously or intuitively (the environment is formed by him automatically with the hidden help of single consciousness), then he has to adress to where data can be, and scanning this "field" to identify by available means (sensations in conjunction with centers processing of data, or intellect) the required objects which are manifesting as copies in consciousness and which are distributed by him in certain order, making surroundings.

Besides, it isn't enough to see in a mirror own image to some living being, to recognize itself in this image: of all living beings of only the person can learn himself in a mirror.

Other living beings don't recognize themselves in a mirror, i.e. they aren't capable to identify own image with themselves, but, nevertheless, they identify according to degree of own reason what is necessary them for deduction of themselves in existence; in other words, these beings live, without understanding themselves, but only feeling, however this ability to sense holds all living beings without self-consciousness in existence – the living beings don't want to lose own sensations.

If to return to analogy to a mirror then its surface by itself is empty – it is nothingness without the relation to something. But this surface is being filled with this or that content in the form of images, if consumers of this content begin contacting with it, allocating on this surface the familiar forms and skipping the unfamiliar, which their consciousness can't decipher. Then this nothingness represents everything that these consumers can identify in it.

So and timeless, infinite and motionless Uniform responds to the requests of consciousness through the sensations, becoming in consciousness out of Nothingness by Everything, which is not Everything in general, but which presents just what consciousness can understand by own means at the moment.

Thus, world through the looking glass is some kind of analog not otherworldly, but the true foundation of beingness, inasmuch only from there (from Uniform through its projection) is possible to receive Everything, but only is possible to receive this own Everything, if there is an idea about this Everything, and if there are corresponding sense organs.

In other words, only into timeless Uniform can find by scanning the forms, which are clear for consciousness (which it is able to decipher). These forms in the form of copies are manifested in consciousness, becoming for it in a final form not as information-wave matter, but being converted to "dense" surroundings, known to us.

Time for any living being, in particular, and for the person actually is the information process, during which material objects are identified by consciousness by surroundings scanning by him with facilities which are at its order (sense organs in combination with the processing centers).

Incoming to consciousness, more precisely, in its relevant centers impulses from sense organs (information packages) contain the coded data on material objects, which consciousness was capable to identify. These signals merge in consciousness in a picture incessantly changing surroundings, inasmuch the pause between the impulses arriving one after another is obliterated in consciousness of living being at the expense of a certain duration of processing of every portion of information and arising thereby the delay, doing for consciousness the discrete process of receipt of information as the continuous (a perception threshold).

Illusion of smooth current of time is created by the fact that consciousness of the person owing to his physiological features isn't capable to notice pulse character of the arriving information.

Change of the rate of "flow" of time for the specific person, or his own time, can be qualified as change of volume of information processed by his centers or change of the rate of its processing that is not directly related to the "external" time, though each person believes "external", as if surrounding him, time, as the only possible time. Therefore the factor of change of the course of own time about which he doesn't know, the person considers as miracle or absolutely inexplicable phenomenon.